Issues: Privacy
ARCHIVED 2009-05-05, DATE APPROXIMATE · VERSION 20090505_rev01 · COMPARED WITH 20090410_rev01
Full text changes — 20090410_rev01 to 20090505_rev01
COLOUR MARKS THE SEVERITY OF A FLAGGED CLAUSE · + AND − MARK ADDED AND REMOVED
| 11 | 11 | Privacy rights are enshrined in our Constitution for a reason - a thriving democracy requires respect for individuals' autonomy as well as anonymous speech and association. These rights must be balanced against legitimate concerns like law enforcement, but checks must be put in place to prevent abuse of government powers. |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 13 | EFF fights in the courts and Congress to extend your privacy rights into the digital world, and supports the development of privacy-protecting technologies. Donate to EFF to help support our efforts. |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 15 | ## Privacy Cases |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | - [Bunnell v. MPAA](https://eff.org/cases/bunnell-v-mpaa) | |
| 17 | 18 | - [Internet Archive et al v Mukasey et al](https://eff.org/cases/archive-v-mukasey) |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 20 | In December 2007, the Internet Archive, along with its counsel the ACLU and EFF, filed a lawsuit challenging a national security letter issued to the Archive. |
| 20 | 21 | |
| 21 | - [NSA Multi-District Litigation](https://eff.org/cases/att) | |
| 22 | ||
| 23 | Documents relating to all cases. | |
| 24 | ||
| 25 | - [Bunnell v. MPAA](https://eff.org/cases/bunnell-v-mpaa) | |
| 26 | 22 | - [Echostar v. Freetech](https://eff.org/cases/echostar-v-freetech) |
| 27 | - [US v Jones](https://eff.org/cases/us-v-jones) | |
| 28 | 23 | - [Long Haul v Regents of the University of California](https://eff.org/cases/long-haul-v-regents-university-california) |
| 29 | 24 | |
| 30 | 25 | EFF and the ACLU of Northern California filed suit in federal court on January 14, 2009 to protect the privacy and free speech rights of two San Francisco Bay Area community organizations after the groups' computers were seized and the data copied by federal and local law enforcement. |
| 31 | 26 | |
| 27 | - [In Re: Matter of Search Warrant (Boston College)](https://eff.org/cases/re-matter-search-warrant-boston-college) | |
| 28 | - [US v Jones](https://eff.org/cases/us-v-jones) | |
| 29 | - [NSA Multi-District Litigation](https://eff.org/cases/att) | |
| 30 | ||
| 31 | Documents relating to all cases. | |
| 32 | ||
| 32 | 33 | - [Doe v. Mukasey (Doe v. Gonzalez, Doe v. Ashcroft)](https://eff.org/cases/doe-v-gonzalez-doe-v-ashcroft) |
| 33 | - [Warshak v. USA](https://eff.org/cases/warshak-v-usa) | |
| 34 | 34 | |
| 35 | 35 | » [All Privacy Cases](https://eff.org/related/384/case) |
| 36 | 36 | |
| 37 | 37 | ## In The News |
| 38 | 38 | |
| 39 | - PALO ALTO DAILY NEWS | March 24, 2009 [Zoombak tracking device raises questions about privacy and safety](https://eff.org/press/mentions/2009/3/24) | |
| 40 | - WIRED NEWS | March 17, 2009 [Obama Administration: Constitution Does Not Protect Cell-Site Records](https://eff.org/press/mentions/2009/3/17) | |
| 41 | - CONSUMERIST | March 16, 2009 [How To Opt Out Of Google's New Targeted Ads](https://eff.org/press/mentions/2009/3/16-1) | |
| 39 | - WIRED NEWS | April 29, 2009 [Obama's 100 Days: High Marks for Science, Low for Privacy](https://eff.org/press/mentions/2009/4/29-0) | |
| 40 | - ZDNET | April 27, 2009 [Device identification in online banking is privacy threat?](https://eff.org/press/mentions/2009/4/27) | |
| 41 | - VNUNET.COM | April 24, 2009 [RSA 2009: Benefits and dangers of device fingerprinting](https://eff.org/press/mentions/2009/4/24) | |
| 42 | 42 | |
| 43 | 43 | » [All Privacy News Articles](https://eff.org/related/384/mention) |
| 44 | 44 | |
| 45 | 45 | ## Other Resources |
| 46 | 46 | |
| 47 | 47 | - April 06, 2009 [Reform The PATRIOT Act: Stop Abuse of National Security Letters](https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy) |